- Change theme
Cloud Penetration Testing Services | Andersen
Secure your cloud with Andersen penetration testing services. Find vulnerabilities across apps, APIs, networks, and IoT before attackers do.
00:47 13 June 2026
Comprehensive Penetration Testing Services for Cloud - based Environments
Trusted penetration testing services simulate real-world cyberattacks to expose security weaknesses across cloud applications, networks and infrastructure. Cloud environments move fast. Workloads spin up overnight, access keys multiply and one misconfigured storage bucket can quietly open a door for attackers. So how do you know your cloud is truly safe? You test it the way an attacker would.
Andersen brings real weight to this work. Its team includes more than 40 cybersecurity experts who have delivered over 300 security projects across FinTech, healthcare and logistics. That depth matters when your data lives in the cloud and the stakes climb with every new deployment.
-
Web Application Testing for Cloud-Hosted Apps
Most cloud applications face the open internet which makes them a natural first target. Andersen's web application testing simulates attacks against these apps to identify vulnerabilities such as injection flaws, authentication weaknesses and insecure configurations.
The output is practical rather than theoretical. Clients receive a detailed vulnerability report with severity classification, proof of concept exploit demonstrations, remediation recommendations and an executive summary for stakeholders. You see the flaw, you see how it could be exploited and you see exactly how to close it.
-
API Security Testing
Cloud applications live and breathe through APIs. They form the connective tissue between services and attackers know it. Andersen combines automated tools with manual analysis from both external and internal perspectives to evaluate how APIs handle authentication, data processing and access control.
What does that examination actually cover? Quite a lot.
- Authorization and authentication mechanisms;
- Input validation and data processing logic;
- Rate limiting and throttling controls;
- Protection of data during transmission;
- Error handling and logging practices;
- Endpoint and HTTP method security.
Miss one of these in a cloud-native app and you hand attackers a clean entry point. APIs rarely fail loudly. They fail quietly and that silence is exactly why they deserve focused testing.
-
Network Penetration Testing
Behind every cloud application sits a web of networks and misconfigurations love to hide there. Andersen's network testing identifies vulnerabilities and weaknesses across internal and external infrastructure, simulating realistic attack scenarios to see how systems and access controls hold up under pressure.
The work spans network mapping and asset discovery, corporate network infrastructure and segmentation controls, on premises Active Directory environments and wireless network security. In hybrid cloud setups where on-premises systems connect to cloud resources, this coverage closes gaps that single layer testing would otherwise leave wide open.
-
IoT Device Testing
Connected devices increasingly feed data straight into cloud platforms and each one widens the attack surface. A vulnerable sensor or gateway can become the unexpected path into your whole environment.
Andersen's IoT hardware testing identifies security vulnerabilities in connected devices by combining automated tools, code review and attack simulation. These assessments evaluate device architecture, communications and operating environments. Coverage includes middleware and framework security, physical device security, back-end communication protection, peripheral interface security, operating system security and application-level security.
-
Red Teaming
Sometimes a checklist is not enough. You need to know how your defenses behave under a coordinated, realistic assault. That is where red teaming earns its keep.
Andersen runs red team engagements that simulate realistic attack scenarios using techniques such as penetration testing, phishing campaigns and social engineering. These controlled exercises probe technical, physical and human security defenses at once. The result is a report on attack paths, an assessment of technical, physical and social controls, proof of concept demonstrations and prioritized recommendations. A stolen credential from a convincing phishing email can bypass even the strongest technical wall, so this human angle carries real weight in the cloud.
-
GDPR and PII-Specific Testing
Cloud systems scatter personal data across services, regions and integrations. Keeping track of it becomes a genuine challenge and regulators are watching.
This testing evaluates how personal data is handled across your systems. It includes analysis of PII touchpoints across systems and workflows, identification and reporting of threats affecting personal data and re-testing after remediation to confirm that fixes actually work. The result validates existing controls and supports compliance with GDPR requirements rather than leaving you guessing.
-
Mobile Application Testing
Plenty of cloud platforms reach users through mobile apps and those apps talk constantly to cloud back-ends. A weakness on either side becomes a weakness everywhere. Testing here evaluates the full attack surface of the app, covering its components, back-end services and supporting infrastructure used during release and operation. The approach blends static analysis of code without executing the app, dynamic testing during runtime and server-side testing of back-end services, APIs and application-server interactions.
Frameworks That Anchor Reliable Assessments
Guesswork has no place in security testing. Established frameworks keep results consistent and repeatable across engagements.
The CIS Cloud Foundations Benchmark deserves a special note. It speaks the native language of cloud security and gives testers a clear baseline for judging how a cloud account is configured.
Tools and a Non-Disruptive Process
Reliable findings depend on dependable instruments. The proven toolkit includes Metasploit, Burp Suite, sqlmap, Nessus, Acunetix, Wireshark, Tenable and Nexpose. A fair worry surfaces here. Will testing crash my live systems? Assessments run in controlled environments with coordinated testing windows and continuous monitoring of system impact, so your cloud keeps serving customers while the work proceeds quietly. Once the scope is defined, engagement can start within approximately five business days.
Conclusion
Cloud environments reward speed but punish carelessness. A single overlooked permission can undo months of careful engineering. By treating web apps, APIs, networks, IoT devices, mobile back ends and personal data as distinct surfaces, each with its own dedicated testing, you turn uncertainty into a clear and ranked action plan. With proven frameworks, certified specialists and a non-disruptive process Andersen helps organizations find hidden weaknesses before attackers do and protect what matters most across cloud-based systems.
FAQ
Can penetration testing run on a live cloud environment without downtime?
Yes. The work happens in controlled conditions with coordinated testing windows and active monitoring which keeps disruption minimal even in production.
My cloud provider already secures the platform, so why test?
Cloud security splits responsibility. The provider protects the underlying platform while you stay accountable for configurations, access and data. Testing examines your side of that line.
Which testing service fits a cloud-native app built mostly on APIs?
API security testing fits best, often paired with web application testing, since both layers carry the bulk of exposure in modern cloud apps.
Do connected devices really need separate testing?
They do. IoT devices introduce their own firmware, communication and physical risks that application or network testing alone would not catch.
What do I receive at the end of an engagement?
A comprehensive report with discovered vulnerabilities, severity classification, proof-of-concept demonstrations and prioritized remediation recommendations.
