12:47 29 September 2009
Oasis singer Liam Gallagher is seeking libel damages from The Guardian newspaper after it incorrectly claimed hed stormed out of a London gig and failed to return.
The rock frontman undertook legal action after publication of the story, which was headlined 'Liam Gallagher storms out of Oasis gig', on the Guardian.co.uk website on July 22.
The story alleged Gallagher had acted unprofessionally and not cared for the audience when he stormed out, not to return, in the middle of a performance at Camden's Roundhouse, according to a writ.
London law firm Carter-Ruck filed the writ claiming that the allegations could deter people from going to future Oasis concerts, despite the group having publicly split since recent Noel Gallagher's departure.
Shortly after the news report appeared Gallagher denied that he had stormed out and made clear that his departure from the stage was short and pre-planned, returning to the stage 10 minutes later.
The Guardian published an apology to the singer on 7 August, saying it had made an error with the original article.
It stated; "In an earlier article 'Liam Gallagher storms out of Oasis gig' published online on 22 July 2009 we wrongly suggested that Liam Gallagher walked out of an Oasis gig and did not return disrupting the set they were performing.
"In fact Liam Gallagher only left the stage whilst his brother sang two songs as is normal during their performance and returned to continue the rest of the set.
"We apologise to Liam Gallagher for this error."
Although the Guardian published an apology, Gallagher claimed it was not issued on agreed terms, and did not provide the vindication to which he was duly entitled.
Gallagher has since argued that The Guardian's apology was not suitably prominent, and was not linked to the website home page but appeared only as a free standing item for roughly 60 hours.
The writ issued to the High Court claimed Guardian News and Media made no effort to contact Gallagher, or any representative of Oasis, before the story appeared and has since failed to make offer of amends.
Gallagher, who said the story damaged his reputation and caused him serious distress and embarrassment, is pursuing his legal action as he believes The Guardian is liable for repetition of the claims on other websites. He is seeking an injunction banning repetition of the allegations.
Disclaimer: Supanet is not responsible for, and disclaims any and all liability for the content of comments written by contributors to this website